Visual editor of scenarios for virtual laboratories
Abstract
The paper presents the implementation of a visual script editor that allows you to design a series of experiments for virtual educational laboratories. The connection of the above approach with the possibility of explicit control over students' involvement and methods of its evaluation is described.
About the Authors
В. Абрамов
Высшая школа информационных технологий и информационных систем Казанского (Приволжского) федерального университета
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
М. Абрамский
Высшая школа информационных технологий и информационных систем Казанского (Приволжского) федерального университета
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
В. Кугуракова
Высшая школа информационных технологий и информационных систем Казанского (Приволжского) федерального университета
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Н. Манахов
Высшая школа информационных технологий и информационных систем Казанского (Приволжского) федерального университета
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
А. Маславиев
Высшая школа информационных технологий и информационных систем Казанского (Приволжского) федерального университета
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Veljko Potkonjak, Michael Gardner, Victor Callaghan, Pasi Mattila, Christian Guetl, Vladimir M. Petrovic, and Kosta Jovanovich. Virtual Laboratories for Education in Science, Technology, and Engineering: a Review // Computers & Education. April 2016. V. 95. P. 309–327.
2. Balamuralithara B., Woods P.C. Virtual Laboratories in Engineering Education: The Simulation Lab and Remote Lab // Computer Applications in Engineering Education, March 2009. V. 17. Issue 1. P. 108–118.
3. Daniel Fernández-Avilés, Diego Dotor, Daniel Contreras, Jose Carlos Salazar. Virtual Labs: A New Tool in the Education: Experience of Technical University of Madrid // 13th Int. Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), 24–26 Feb. 2016. P. 271–272.
4. Zoric Nedic, Jan Machotka, Andrew Nafalski. Remote Laboratories Versus Virtual and Real Laboratories // Frontiers in Education. 2003. FIE 2003 33rd Annual, T3E-1-T3E-6. V. 1.
5. Михайлов В.Ю., Гостев В.М., Кугуракова В.В., Чугунов В.А. Виртуальная лаборатория как средство обеспечения коллективной научно-методической работы // Сб. трудов XII международной конференции «ИТО-2002». Часть IV (Москва, 4–8 ноября 2002 г.). М.: МИФИ, 2002. С. 31–34.
6. Abramov V.D., Kugurakova V.V., Rizvanov A.A., Abramskiy M.M., Manakhov N.R., Evstafiev M.M. Virtual Biotechnological Lab // BioNanoSci. 2016. http://link. springer.com/article/10.1007/s12668-016-0368-9
7. Абрамов В.Д., Кугуракова В.В., Ризванов А.А., Абрамский М.М., Манахов Н.Р., Евстафьев М.Е. Виртуальные лаборатории как средство обучения биомедицинским технологиям // Russian Digital Libraries Journal. 2016. V. 19. No 3. P. 129–148.
8. Gameplay: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gameplay.
9. Nonlinear Gameplay: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonlinear_gameplay.
10. Silva P.B., Müller P., Bidarra R., and Coelho A. Node-based Shape Grammar Representation and Editing // Proceedings of the Workshop on Procedural Content Generation in Games (PCG '13), May 2013. 8 p. https://graphics.tudelft.nl/ Publications-new/2013/SMBC13a/SMBC13a.pdf.
11. Patow G. User-friendly Graph Editing for Procedural Modeling of Buildings// IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 2012. V. 32. No 2. P. 66–75.
12. Thillainathan N. A Model Driven Development Framework for Serious Games // Information Systems. 2013. Informatik 2013, Doctoral Consortium, Koblenz, Germany. P. 81-92. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/67b5/ c60d12628e3aebe64e61c133147d60451049.pdf.
13. Thillainathan N., Leimeister J.M. Educators as Game Developers — Model-driven Visual Programming of Serious Games // Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems. 2016. V. 416 of the book series “Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (AISC)”. P. 335–349. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-27478-2_23.
14. Manual Unity: https://docs.unity3d.com/ru.
15. A. Rollings and D. Morris. Game Architecture and Design—A New Edition, New Riders, 2004. 930 p. https://gamifique.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/6-game-architecture-and-design-a-new-edition.pdf
16. Derbali L., Ghali R. and Frasson C. Assessing Motivational Strategies in Serious Games Using Hidden Markov Models // Proceedings of the 26th Int. Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, 2013. P. 538–541. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/FLAIRS/FLAIRS13/paper/viewFile/ 5941/6133.
17. Boyer K.E., Phillips R., Wallis M., Vouk M., and Lester J. Balancing Cognitive and Motivational Scaffolding in Tutorial Dialogue // Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). 2008. V. 5091. P. 239–249.
18. Jiau H.C., Chen J.C., and Ssu K. Enhancing Self-motivation in Learning Programming Using Game-based Simulation and Metrics // IEEE Transactions on Education. 2009. V. 52, No 4. P. 555–562. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5164890/ authors
19. Leidig S. Analysis of User Attention for Adaptive Serious Games – Design and Implementation of an Evaluation Framework // Master’s Thesis. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 2016. 86 p.
20. Nielsen J. Usability Inspection Methods// Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, Colorado, USA, ACM (1995). P. 377–378.
21. Nielsen J. Enhancing the Explanatory Power of Usability Heuristics // Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1994.
22. Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. Elsevier, 1994. 362 p.
23. Polson P.G. et al. Cognitive Walkthroughs: a Method for Theory-based Evaluation of User Interfaces// Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 1992. V. 36. No 5. P. 741–773.
24. Kahn M.J., Prail A. Formal Usability Inspections// In: Usability Inspection Methods. Wiley, New York, 1994. P. 141–171.
25. Bias R.G. The Pluralistic Usability Walkthrough: Coordinated Empathies// In: Usability Inspection Methods. Edited by Jakob Nielsen and Robert L. Mack, published by John Wiley & Sons, New York Wiley, New York, 1994. https://www.nngroup.com/ books/usability-inspection-methods/
26. Bell B.R. Walkthroughs. Using Programming: Using Programming Walkthroughs to Design a Visual Language. University of Colorado at Boulder. Boulder, CO, USA, 1992.
27. Wixon D. et al. Inspections and Design Reviews: Framework, History and Reflection // In: Usability Inspection Methods. Edited by Jakob Nielsen and Robert L. Mack, published by John Wiley & Sons, New York Wiley, New York, 1994. https://www. nngroup.com/books/usability-inspection-methods/
Review
For citations:
, , , , Visual editor of scenarios for virtual laboratories. Russian Digital Libraries Journal. 2016;19(6):483-501. (In Russ.)
Views:
21
Email this article 