ellibsЭлектронные библиотекиRussian Digital Libraries Journal1562-5419Казанский (Приволжский) федеральный университетellibs-718Research ArticleСтатьиНаучное соавторство по данным РИНЦ и Scopus за 2000–2020 годы: тенденции ростаScientific Co-Authorship According to RSCI and Scopus Data for 2000-2020: Growth TrendsДурневСергей АндреевичDurnevSergey Andreevichdurnev@elibrary.ruЗнаменскаяЕкатерина АлександровнаZnamenskayaEkaterina Aleksandrovnaekaterin@mi-ras.ruПечниковАндрей АнатольевичPechnikovAndrey Anatolievichpechnikov@krc.karelia.ruЧебуковДмитрий ЕвгеньевичChebukovDmitry Evgen'evichtche@mi-ras.ruООО «Научная электронная библиотека»Scientific Electronic Library (eLIBRARY.RU)Математический институт им. В. А. Стеклова Российской академии наукSteklov Mathematical Institute of RASИнститут прикладных математических исследований – обособленное подразделение ФИЦ «Карельский научный центр Российской академии наук»Institute of Applied Mathematical Research of the Karelian Research Centre of RASМатематический институт им. В.А. Стеклова Российской академии наукSteklov Mathematical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences2026040320262916075Copyright © Дурнев С.А., Знаменская Е.А., Печников А.А., Чебуков Д.Е., 20262026Дурнев С.А., Знаменская Е.А., Печников А.А., Чебуков Д.Е.Durnev S.A., Znamenskaya E.A., Pechnikov A.A., Chebukov D.E.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://ellibs.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/718

Научное соавторство является непосредственным отражением научного сотрудничества. Зарубежные исследования, выполненные на основе данных Web of Science и Scopus, показывают, что на протяжении последних десятилетий наблюдается рост числа соавторов научных публикаций в международных журналах в различных дисциплинах. В работе проведено сравнение тенденций роста числа соавторов по данным РИНЦ и Scopus для пяти тематических областей (химия, история, математика, медицина и физика) за период с 2000 по 2020 г. Получены схожесть тенденций научного соавторства в случаях публикаций по истории и математике и заметное различие по остальным научным направлениям.

Scientific co-authorship is a direct reflection of scientific collaboration. Foreign studies based on Web of Science and Scopus data show that over the past decades there has been an increase in the number of co-authors of scientific publications in international journals in various disciplines. The paper compares the growth trends in the number of co-authors according to the RSCI and Scopus data. The study was conducted in five thematic areas (chemistry, history, mathematics, medicine, and physics) from 2000 to 2020. The article shows the identity of the trends in the growth of the number of co-authors in the cases of publications on history and mathematics, and a noticeable difference in other scientific fields.

публикациясоавторствоколичество соавторов статьиРИНЦScopuspublicationco-authorshipnumber of co-authors of the articleRSCIScopusReferencesKlein F., Lie S. Sur une certaine famille de courbes et de surfaces // Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences. 1870. P. 1222–1226, 1275–1279.Klein F., Lie S. Sur une certaine famille de courbes et de surfaces // Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences. 1870. P. 1222–1226, 1275–1279.Newman M.E.J. The structure of scientific collaboration networks // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2001. Vol. 98. No. 2. P. 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404Newman M.E.J. The structure of scientific collaboration networks // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2001. Vol. 98. No. 2. P. 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404Durnev S.А., Znamenskaya E.A., Pechnikov A.A., Chebukov D.E. Comparative analysis of scientific co-authorship in Russia // Bibliosphere. 2025. No. 3. P. 110–119. https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2025-3-110-119Durnev S.А., Znamenskaya E.A., Pechnikov A.A., Chebukov D.E. Comparative analysis of scientific co-authorship in Russia // Bibliosphere. 2025. No. 3. P. 110–119. https://doi.org/10.20913/1815-3186-2025-3-110-119Cronin B. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2001. Vol. 52. No. 7. P. 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097Cronin B. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2001. Vol. 52. No. 7. P. 558–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097Clement T.P. Authorship matrix: a rational approach to quantify individual contributions and responsibilities in multi-author scientific articles // Science and Engineering Ethics. 2014. Vol. 20. No. 2. P. 345–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9454-3Clement T.P. Authorship matrix: a rational approach to quantify individual contributions and responsibilities in multi-author scientific articles // Science and Engineering Ethics. 2014. Vol. 20. No. 2. P. 345–361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9454-3Resnik D.B., Tyle A.M., Black J.R., Kissling G. Authorship policies of scientific journals // Journal of Medical Ethics. 2016. Vol. 42. No. 3. P. 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-103171Resnik D.B., Tyle A.M., Black J.R., Kissling G. Authorship policies of scientific journals // Journal of Medical Ethics. 2016. Vol. 42. No. 3. P. 199–202. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-103171Osborne J.W., Holland A. What is authorship, and what should it be? A survey of prominent guidelines for determining authorship in scientific publications // Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 1. Article Number 15. 19 pp. https://doi.org/10.7275/25pe-ba85Osborne J.W., Holland A. What is authorship, and what should it be? A survey of prominent guidelines for determining authorship in scientific publications // Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 1. Article Number 15. 19 pp. https://doi.org/10.7275/25pe-ba85Thelwall M., Maflahi N. Research coauthorship 1900–2020: Continuous, universal, and ongoing expansion // Quantitative Science Studies. 2022. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00188Thelwall M., Maflahi N. Research coauthorship 1900–2020: Continuous, universal, and ongoing expansion // Quantitative Science Studies. 2022. Vol. 3. No. 2. P. 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00188Research Co-authorship 1900-2020: Continuous, universal, and ongoing expansion. URL: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Research_Co-authorship_1900-2020_Continuous_universal_and_ongoing_expansion/17064419.Research Co-authorship 1900-2020: Continuous, universal, and ongoing expansion. URL: https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Research_Co-authorship_1900-2020_Continuous_universal_and_ongoing_expansion/17064419.Rossiiskiy indeks nauchnogo citirovaniya. URL: https://elibrary.ru/project_risc.asp.Rossiiskiy indeks nauchnogo citirovaniya. URL: https://elibrary.ru/project_risc.asp.Kody GRNTI. URL: https://грнти.рф/kody-grnti.Kody GRNTI. URL: https://грнти.рф/kody-grnti.O novom reitinge zhurnalov Science Index. URL: https://elibrary.ru/projects/science_index/ranking_info.asp.O novom reitinge zhurnalov Science Index. URL: https://elibrary.ru/projects/science_index/ranking_info.asp.Spisok zhurnalov, vhodyaschih v bazu dannyh RSCI. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/projects/rsci/rsci.pdf.Spisok zhurnalov, vhodyaschih v bazu dannyh RSCI. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/projects/rsci/rsci.pdf.Appendix 1. URL: https://homepage.mi-ras.ru/~tche/download/appendix1.xlsx.Appendix 1. URL: https://homepage.mi-ras.ru/~tche/download/appendix1.xlsx.Klassifikaciya ASJC v Scopus. URL: https://научныепереводы.рф/classification_asjc_scopus.Klassifikaciya ASJC v Scopus. URL: https://научныепереводы.рф/classification_asjc_scopus.Antopol’skii A.B., Belozerov V.N., Markarova T.S., Dmitrieva E.Yu. Ustanivlenie sootvetstvii rubric GRNTI rubrikam drugih system klassificacii // Nauchno-tehnicheskaya informaciya. Ser. 1. Organizaciya i metodika informacionnoi raboty. 2015. No. 3. S. 3–19.Antopol’skii A.B., Belozerov V.N., Markarova T.S., Dmitrieva E.Yu. Ustanivlenie sootvetstvii rubric GRNTI rubrikam drugih system klassificacii // Nauchno-tehnicheskaya informaciya. Ser. 1. Organizaciya i metodika informacionnoi raboty. 2015. No. 3. S. 3–19.Set’ klassificacionnyh system. URL: http://rffi20.viniti.ru.Set’ klassificacionnyh system. URL: http://rffi20.viniti.ru.NISO. CRediT, Contributor Roles Taxonomy. URL: https://groups.niso.org/higherlogic/ws/public/download/26466/ANSI-NISO-Z39.104-2022.pdf.NISO. CRediT, Contributor Roles Taxonomy. URL: https://groups.niso.org/higherlogic/ws/public/download/26466/ANSI-NISO-Z39.104-2022.pdf.Guba K.S., Slovogorodskii N.A. Publish or Perish v rossiiskih social’nyh naukah: pattern soavtorstva v “hischnyh” i “chistyh” zhurnalah // Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2022. No. 4. S. 80–106. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-4-80-106Guba K.S., Slovogorodskii N.A. Publish or Perish v rossiiskih social’nyh naukah: pattern soavtorstva v “hischnyh” i “chistyh” zhurnalah // Voprosy obrazovaniya. 2022. No. 4. S. 80–106. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-4-80-106Gureev V.N., Lakizo I.G., Mazov N.A. Unethical authorship in scientific publications (a review of the problem) // Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 2019. Vol. 46. No. 4. P. 219–232. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688219040026Gureev V.N., Lakizo I.G., Mazov N.A. Unethical authorship in scientific publications (a review of the problem) // Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 2019. Vol. 46. No. 4. P. 219–232. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688219040026Efimova G.Z. Soavtorstvo ili solo-avtorstvo: soblyudenie tradicii ili svobodnyi vybor? // Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologiy. 2022. Т. 13. No. 1. S. 130–148. https://doi.org/10.24412/2079-0910-2022-1-130-148Efimova G.Z. Soavtorstvo ili solo-avtorstvo: soblyudenie tradicii ili svobodnyi vybor? // Sotsiologiya nauki i tekhnologiy. 2022. Т. 13. No. 1. S. 130–148. https://doi.org/10.24412/2079-0910-2022-1-130-148Matveeva N.N. Bibliometricheskii analiz vzaimodeistviya uchenyh v rossiiskih vyzah: kooperaciya vs individual’naya produktivnost’ // Universitetskoe upravlenie: Praktika i analiz. 2020. Т. 24. No. 2. S. 26–43. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2020.02.012Matveeva N.N. Bibliometricheskii analiz vzaimodeistviya uchenyh v rossiiskih vyzah: kooperaciya vs individual’naya produktivnost’ // Universitetskoe upravlenie: Praktika i analiz. 2020. Т. 24. No. 2. S. 26–43. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2020.02.012

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.